To Colleagues on First and Second Science Groups, I think that my own small contributions pale in comparison with the efforts by the Bearden group, and it is an honor to place this work on the website, due to the generosity of Roger Cathey. It is www.europa.com/~rsc/physics At the very least, these theories should be looked at objectively and open-mindedly, as Hewlett Packard seems to be doing now. MWE cc science groups and others. ------------------------- FROM: Tebearden, INTERNET:Tebearden@aol.com TO: (unknown), INTERNET:jdecker@keelynet.com CC: (unknown), INTERNET:president@whitehouse.gov (unknown), INTERNET:halfox@slkc.uswest.net (unknown), INTERNET:jian@us0.mayo.edu (unknown), INTERNET:walrod@ime.unicamp.br (unknown), INTERNET:gjohnson@ksu.edu (unknown), INTERNET:bscott@metz.une.edu.au Prof. G. Kalbermann, INTERNET:HOPE@vms.huji.ac.il (unknown), INTERNET:petkell@stc.net (unknown), INTERNET:TCupolo@aol.com (unknown), INTERNET:science@mail.frii.com (unknown), INTERNET:Exec-Sec-Central@hq.doe.gov (unknown), FishnChips (unknown), INTERNET:protech@frii.com (unknown), INTERNET:sorenbh@ibm.net Federico F. Pena, INTERNET:Federico.F.Pena@hq.doe.gov Alexander S. Labounsky, INTERNET:alexander.s.labounsky@boeing.com Robert G. Flower, INTERNET:chronos@mail.enter.net (unknown), INTERNET:btillman@colsa.com (unknown), INTERNET:jhayes@colsa.com (unknown), INTERNET:fsmart@tarapublishing.com (unknown), INTERNET:aiken@chem.columbia.edu (unknown), INTERNET:henry.monteith@enmu.edu (unknown), INTERNET:shelburne_john@ccmail.ncsc.navy.mil (unknown), INTERNET:Reed15@marshall.edu (unknown), INTERNET:Puthoff@aol.com (unknown), INTERNET:Mhermanns@aol.com (unknown), INTERNET:ziolkowski@ece.arizona.edu Dr Fred Wood, INTERNET:fwood@igc.apc.org Dr Fred Woods Sr., INTERNET:csiri@igc.apc.org (unknown), INTERNET:ExplorePub@aol.com (unknown), INTERNET:mps@internetmci.com (unknown), INTERNET:john1@nidlink.com (unknown), INTERNET:FGolden238@aol.com (unknown), cliveleach (unknown), INTERNET:randyd@ro.com (unknown), INTERNET:orbitx@ois.com.au Dr. Terence Barrett, INTERNET:Barrett506@aol.com (unknown), INTERNET:geri@scitech.state.nj.us (unknown), INTERNET:peggy@scitech.state.nj.us (unknown), INTERNET:franz@scitech.state.nj.us (unknown), INTERNET:robin@scitech.state.nj.us (unknown), INTERNET:dave@scitech.state.nj.us (unknown), INTERNET:jay@scitech.state.nj.us (unknown), INTERNET:4kenmoore@sprintmail.com (unknown), [76570,2270] (unknown), [101471,1777] (unknown), steveferguson (unknown), [113356,56] (unknown), [70403,3645] DATE: 21/12/97 13:27 Re: Re: Purported Overunity Results by Hewlett Packard Sender: Tebearden@aol.com Received: from imo13.mx.aol.com (imo13.mx.aol.com [198.81.19.167]) by arl-img-6.compuserve.com (8.8.6/8.8.6/2.9) with ESMTP id NAA16496; Sun, 21 Dec 1997 13:27:01 -0500 (EST) From: Tebearden Message-ID: <36c5e2c7.349d5ea7@aol.com> Date: Sun, 21 Dec 1997 13:23:32 EST To: jdecker@keelynet.com Cc: 4kenmoore@sprintmail.com, jay@scitech.state.nj.us, dave@scitech.state.nj.us, robin@scitech.state.nj.us, franz@scitech.state.nj.us, peggy@scitech.state.nj.us, geri@scitech.state.nj.us, FishnChips@compuserve.com, Barrett506@aol.com, cliveleach@compuserve.com, orbitx@ois.com.au, randyd@ro.com, FGolden238@aol.com, john1@nidlink.com, mps@internetmci.com, ExplorePub@aol.com, csiri@igc.apc.org, fwood@igc.apc.org, ziolkowski@ece.arizona.edu, Mhermanns@aol.com, Puthoff@aol.com, 76570.2270@compuserve.com, 101471.1777@compuserve.com, Reed15@marshall.edu, steveferguson@compuserve.com, shelburne_john@ccmail.ncsc.navy.mil, henry.monteith@enmu.edu, aiken@chem.columbia.edu, fsmart@tarapublishing.com, jhayes@colsa.com, btillman@colsa.com, chronos@mail.enter.net, alexander.s.labounsky@boeing.com, 70403.3645@compuserve.com, Federico.F.Pena@hq.doe.gov, sorenbh@ibm.net, protech@frii.com, Exec-Sec-Central@hq.doe.gov, science@mail.frii.com, TCupolo@aol.com, petkell@stc.net, HOPE@vms.huji.ac.il, bscott@metz.une.edu.au, gjohnson@ksu.edu, walrod@ime.unicamp.br, jian@us0.mayo.edu, halfox@slkc.uswest.net, 113356.56@compuserve.com, president@whitehouse.gov Subject: Re: Purported Overunity Results by Hewlett Packard Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com) X-Mailer: Inet_Mail_Out (IMOv11) Jerry, Probably a circuit that was somewhat akin to a thing that Westinghouse placed in the Minuteman missile some years ago. In those days electronics were still more bulky, and space and weight were at a premium on board ICBMs etc. So the engineers set about to design a highly efficient frequency converter for the Minuteman. It had to be at least 90% efficient, preferrably 95%. The engineers used germanium transistors and state-of-the-art feedforward and feedback loops, to squeeze every bit of efficiency out of there that was possible. Something like 64 transistors were involved in the forward and reverse multiplelooping. Well, one sometimes gets a peculiar effect in such cases. Let me diverge a bit for some necessary background. Nonlinear optics is based on the fact that, when materials (3-space) are sufficiently nonlinear, then wave-to-wave interaction occurs, instead of just absorption and emission of radiation. Linear materials (those which do not usually produce harmonics) essentially react classically. For most cases, sufficient nonlinearity only occurs at optical-band frequencies. Hence such materials are called "optical materials." That just means they produce (1) harmonics, and (2) wave-to-wave interactions. Normal NLO theory of course just uses transverse EM waves (for the input, and for the pumping.). "Pumping" in simplest case means this (we are working in the optical band): If two opposing waves strike a NLO material, equal and opposite forces (force fields) are created in and on the material. In short, you are "squeezing" the material rhythmically. If you have a third wave (referred to as the "signal" wave) introduced to this "squeezed NLO material", then all the 3 waves may interact to produce a fourth wave. This fourth wave is (1) a true phase conjugate (time-reversed) replica (PCR) of the input signal wave, and (2) amplified in that it can contain up to all the energy in the two "pumping" waves, and (3) in simplest case the PCR wave will just precisely backtrack the path previously taken by the signal wave (in short, the vacuum "has a memory," although the NLO folks do not say that at all). Well, normally when you transmit a wave, it diverges even though you try to "beam" it as tightly as possible. But if you produce one of these PCR waves out there in space, in response to the received signal from your diverging beam, that response PCR wave will converge back upon that distant transmission point! In advanced systems this can be done very well. The plans for the spaceborne laser, e.g., used this plus another fact to be able to keep a laser beam locked upon a single spot on a rising hostile booster -- say, 10,000 miles away -- for long enough dwell time to burn right through the booster casing and destroy the missile. The other fact used was "self-targeting," which is very important. Here you have two pumped phase conjugate mirrors (PPCMs) facing each other (they may be a great distance apart). When PCM 1 receives a signal from PCM 2, even a diverging signal, PCM 1 will emit a PCR wave that will converge entirely upon the transmission point in PCM 2. In return, when PCM 2 receives a signal from PCM 1, even diverging, PCM 2 will emit a PCR wave which precisely backtracks to PCM 1, converging all the while. In the perfect case, what happens is that all the energy emitted between PCM 1 and PCM 2 narrows into precisely parallel beams of energy joining the two. This adaptive process is an example of self-targeting. Suppose your transmitters (PCM 1 and PCM 2) are pumped, so that they are pumped phase conjugate mirrors (PPCMs). Immediately you see that enormously greater energy density can now be transferred between PPCM 1 and PPCM 2. Now consider the average energy density existing in the separating space (beam path) between PPCM 1 and PPCM 2. It is now much higher. That is where the conventional theory essentially stops. We need to go a little further, because they do not utilize Poynting energy flow theory, and multiple retroreflection of the SAME energy. Note that what they use is always additional energy, constantly being input by the pumping waves of PPCM 1 and PPCM 2. So there is no overunity there at all (although a British scientist did some interesting things which essentially involved overunity, but they never so stated). Essentially all semiconductor materials are also NLO materials. Voila! Under the right circumstances, these things will play "self-targeting" (which I just called "ping pong" with each other. That's pretty rare, though, because we normally don't use optical transmissions between them, but instead much lower frequency signals along wires, so that the ping pong is continually extinguished and not noticeable. So let's change that, with a mechanism I worked out in decipering what the actual Priore mechanism was in his plasma mixing tube, that could heal cancer, infectious diseases, etc. Briefly, if you pump with transverse EM waves and use a transverse signal wave input, you get PCR wave outputs. However (and here is something I'm trying to patent right now, and included in my graduate seminar at University of Louisville on Nov. 20, 1997), if you pump ANY material with longitudinal EM waves, you are pumping with time oscillations along the time axis (I'll go into that in my forthcoming Priore book, to show that longitudinal EM waves also are oscillations of the rate of time flow). Well, the time axis is at right angles (simple case) to 3-space and therefore to 3-space materials. That's about as nonlinear as you can get to 3-space; so its totally nonlinear. That is the great secret! You get NLO functioning at any and every frequency, even ELF. In this "longitudinal wave pumping" (LWP), you do not use conventional transverse waves, either to pump or as a signal wave. Instead, you use the pattern of all variations in the time portion of spacetime surrounding each and every piece of mass in the pumped mass. Here you must pass into full general relativity. Wheeler's principle tells us that mass (trapped energy forms) curves local spacetime, and curved local spacetime produces a force upon that mass. Complexes of mass (as in an atom or a molecule) produce complexes (templates) of internested local spacetime curvatures. Remember, in generall relativity the spacetime geometry is active, always acting on any mass embedded in it. Imagine a mass and all its internal dynamics (quarks, nucleons, electron shells, lattice structures, etc.) as a very dynamic sort of "hand." The local spacetime exists as a dynamic "glove" precisely fitting all aspects of that hand, in the greatest detail. Call this "dynamic glove" of internested local curvatures of spacetime a vacuum engine. Well, if you deliberately produce a vacuum engine, it will act upon any mass embedded in it (that's just GR). But since longitudinal EM waves oscillate the rate of flow of time, for every part of a mass that they interact with, then it means that longitudinal EM waves affect and change (and oscillate) those little pieces of time that are part of that local spacetime "glove." If you vary the energy density of ST, you affect the time portion also (as in the well-known time dilation with velocity, a most simple case). On the other hand, if you vary the time density of ST, you also affect the energy density portion. In GR, nothing much has been done with the time density and how to vary that. In fact, they just missed about half the GR that is available to use -- in fact, the part that can be done on the bench electrodynamically. So we may regard complexes of longitudinal EM waves as also constituting vacuum engines in spacetime itself. This is why (from a GR view) such complexes -- such vacuum engines -- will affect any matter, regardless of the frequency involved, and regardless of how fine a level we wish to affect. In theory one can as easily flip quarks in nucleons as anything else, which of course directly transmutes the element. Whew! After all that, we are now ready to return to arrays of semiconductors that use very sophisticated feedforward and feedback. With such multiloop feedbacks, particularly lots of them, the individual transistor may have feedback signals from many others at once. Examine now those aspects of the transverse signals that "cancel" because of phase antiparallelism. Voila! The energies of the zeroing components exist and superpose, but the time aspects are antiparallel. That actually turns an EM wave into a gravitational wave, where the energy density of ST is oscillating, and the degree of forceful opposition of the time axis components are oscillating. That makes an oscillating scalar potential (in terms of 3-space) and also an oscillating time wave. In short, that makes a longitudinal wave. Ziolkowski also had a recent beautiful paper where he showed you would get longitudinal waves anyhow, except that when you make a transverse wave, you also make a function that "kills" or cancels the longitudinal wave. Well, some time ago I had stumbled into the fact that when you zero-summed transverse waves, you made longitudinal waves. Anyway, the engineers just discard zero summations, so they (1) do not track such longitudinal wave formation in their circuits, (2) do not use such, and (3) do not even know about such. So they are always trying to optimize the dadblamed transverse waves, which means they are also optimizing the dadblamed destruction of the longitudinal waves! They throw away the lab bench engineering of full general relativity, just so they can play with transverse wave electronics! Now you can begin to see what happens (inadvertently to the engineers) when the cancellations in all those feedback and feedforward loops get going. You can get some accidental stabilization of small residues of the longitudinal EM wave pumping. So you get vacuum engineering going just a bit, that is, you are now using vacuum engines rather than signals -- two quite different matters. In signal theory, the vacuum does not interfere. In vacuum engineering, the vacuum is the active ingredient, and the signals are just the byproducts. If you get ping pong (self-targeting) going between various semiconductors in such arrays, you get these effects: (1) you get self-targeting in the energy domain, so that multiretroreflection of the same Poynting energy occurs. This means that in the multiple collections, you are getting a little additional collection from the huge normally nondivergent (nonintercepted, noncollected) Poynting flow after every pass. End result, as I showed in my May 1997 paper at the New Energy Symposium in Denver, is that the participating retroreflectors start to asymmetrically self-regauge themselves. In short, they start to collect more energy from the same energy flow, retroreflected multiple times. They increase their own potentials, thereby increasing their own Poynting flow output, which is being extracted directly from the vacuum interaction with the charged particles and dipoles (particle physics, not classical EM). At the same time, disturbing factors also start to increase as a function of the increasing local energy density. This means that, where the disruption curves and increasing energy density curves cross, there will result a stabilized threshold level where the unit can operate. If, however, this level is well-beyond the failure aspects of the participating components (which is most often is), then the array will just self destruct in one or more transistors. Our own team was blowing transistors off the board in one-foot flash diameter sudden violent explosions in 1990. We know what has to be done to control the excess buildup, but certainly did not have the type of team and laboratory facilities necessary to tame it. Perhaps Hewlett Packard has done so, and had the necessary team. If so, they almost certainly do not understand the mechanism, but have discovered how to do it. In the Westinghouse Minuteman case, all the output side electronics started failing out there in the field. After much investigation, it was found that the average unit was putting out about 115%. The receiving electronics could not accept that much. Corporate officials came down hard on the engineers, so they just put in limiting diodes, etc. and spoiled the ping pong. That brought the thing down to about 95% efficient, and the electronics on the output side quit blowing out. Everybody was happy, and everybody continued to use those "crippled overunity units" in the Minuteman missile. Westinghouse quietly filed five or six patents around that, and that was the end of that. Everybody "knows" that you cannot produce an EM system that puts out more than you input! They have all been educated in the crippled Maxwellian equations that only deal with EM systems that have already been violently wrenched into local equilibrium with their vacuum exchange. Maxwell's equations (Heaviside version) do indeed allow open EM systems freely receiving excess energy from their environment, and producing overunity. Such systems can (1) self-oscillate, (2) self-organize, and (3) power themselves while simultaneously powering a load. There is no problem at all in extracting all the EM energy you wish from the vacuum. Everything does that anyway! Our normal circuits only capture and use about 10exp(-13) of the actual energy flow extracted from the vacuum by the source dipole. Heaviside pointed out that most of the energy was just wasted in nondivergent form. Lorentz impatiently formulated a procedure that just discards all that 10exp13 component, leaving only the 10exp(-13) component. That tiny little remaining "diverged" (collected) fraction is what drives our circuits. Lorentz also taught us the completely stupid (from a power system viewpoint) procedure of symmetrically regauging Maxwell-Heaviside equations before we use them. In other words, he taught us to discard far more systems -- all those that asymmetrically self-regauge so as to retain a net force and be able to use that excess free energy in a load -- than he retained. Since then, all our engineers have dutifully -- like good little parrots -- applied those equations AFTER the Lorentz procedure has been invoked. Free energy experimenters always expected a conspiracy somewhere. It actually was an innocent conspiracy originally. The old guys did it to ease the solution of the equations mathematically. It appears that one or two later realized what I speak of in this writeup. However, their controllers (the financial end) in secret has had this kind of thing suppressed for decades. Now you know the exact nature of the real conspiracy. It is innocent on the part of the scientists for 99.9999% of the cases. It is not innocent at all on the part of a very few powerful industrialists who know this and pass it along. Both the Russians (Moscow University) and the U.S. (Gabriel Kron for a contractor in a Navy contract at Stanford University) made free energy devices in the 1930s. The Russian work is fully documented in the hard Russian physics literature and the French physics literature. The KGB/Communists suppressed the Russian work at the beginning of WW II. I do not know what happened in France to cause its abandonment. In the U.S., Kron's work was never openly released on what he called his "negative resistor" which, when connected to the Network Analyzer at Stanford, allowed the NA to be disconnected from the generator because the negative resistor would power it. Heck, Jerry, I was 68 this month. It's about time that I pass along some of this mess I uncovered after so many years of painful work. At least we can steer the young fellows in the right direction, instead of just waving our arms and shouting "It's resonance! It's resonance! Anti-Stokes emission, e.g., has been verified overunity (the medium outputs more energy than the operator inputs) just applies ping pong multiple retroreflection of the Poynting energy, to increase the collection and thereby asymmetrically regauge. However, you will not find that explanation in the literature. Instead, they avoid the issue by saying something like "it takes the excess energy from the internal energy of the molecule." Well, just apply the conservation of energy law to the molecule as well. Since it does not collapse, it has to get that excess energy from someplace else. Nothing is said about that! Patterson's process utilizes ping poing also, as we pointed out at the New Energy Symposium in Denver. In a particularly dense medium or under very particular circumstances, the levels of energy due to the sudden asymmetrical regauging of the kick-in of multipass multiple collection, can be enormous. It accounts, I believe, for the gamma ray burster, among other superenergetic astronomical entities. Recently a gammar ray burster was observed to "kick-in" in an already exploding gas. Here, the forces produced so immediately, also caused tremendous immediate acceleration of the particles participating in the asymmetrical self-regauging "kick-in". With movement, the geometry was broken. So the product is an outburst of enormous energy density that then sharply extinguished. Holding the geometry a little longer gives a higher energy density burst, such as from pair annihilation. At extremely rare intervals (say, every so many billions of years), one of these ping pongers kicks in, in just the right medium, so that the energy density rises sufficiently to break 4-d Minkowski spacetime. That is, you directly spill out into higher dimensions. What happens is that you burst 4-d spacetime, and spill out enormous energy buildup in a new 4-space in the n-space of the cosmos. In other words, you create a new big bang which in turn creates another universe. In our paper at the Energy Symposium, we modified the standard work energy theorem to incorporate the new phenomenon, because the present theorem implicitly assumes single-pass collection of energy from the Poynting flow. So that has been formally proposed. It is regrettable that the physics journals and hard conferences will not examine such a thing dealing with a change in the assumed foundations of physics. However, we get it published one way or another, in whatever means we can. Presently several of my writeups have been graciously placed on the web by Dr. Myron Evans, a real superscientist of first caliber, who has himself played a major role in a forthcoming rebirth and extension of physics by establishing the nonzero existence of the B(3) gauge. He has himself paid a dear price, been hounded from his position, etc. because of changing something that goes against the grain although it has now been well- established. Dr. Evans has the web site which contains papers dealing with the very forefront of physics today. Let me make clear that my own work is largely dealing with foundations concepts. Most of the mathematics I leave to others, being far too rusty in it myself to do proper justice. But there certainly are physicists today who are doing work in these areas, and who have the full competence in all the mathematical areas. Electrodynamics is now in a revitalization and rebirth, a revolution if you will, with the incredible work of scientists such as Dr. Evans, Barrett, Ziolkowski, Rodrigues, and others. As an example, embedding EM back into the quaternions from whence it came, or into the even higher topology Clifford Algebra, is producing a revolution. EM particles (solutions to the equations that move slower than lightspeed), superluminal solutions (which move faster than lightspeed), and others -- mostly longitudinal EM wave solutions -- have emerged. Some empirical data now supports these developments. Evans cites a specific experiment which clearly shows B(3) nonzero, in contradiction of the standard assumption. Mozart's 40th symphony has been translated through a waveguide at 4.7 c. So the old notion that one cannot transmit information or energy faster than the speed of light in ambient vacuum must be changed. By using the longitudinal EM waves (which are also time oscillations), you can indeed transmit both energy and information faster than light speed. Hopefully the top theorists will also start to drive into additional areas: (1) the fact that photons and waves carry time components as well as energy components , (2) there is an electromagnetic mechanism that generates the rate of flow of time itself, and that mechanism is engineerable, and (3) all the old 4-space Minkowski limitations may be overcome or avoided by higher topology and higher dimensions, and (4) there also exists a hidden EM topology and dynamics infolded inside any ordinary EM wave, field, or potential, and (5) the infolded electromagnetics -- the "infolded topology within the outfolded topologies" -- is the secret to developing a unified field theory that is engineerable upon the laboratory bench. Anyhow, hopefully that gives you some insight into the business of multiarrayed semiconductors performing overunity. If our own team had had the funding and lab facilities, you would already have seen such on the market. God speed, good luck in your experimenting, and have a nice Christmas and New Year's holiday. Cheers, Tom Bearden Also,