Return-Path: Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 05:27:28 -0400 From: Evans Subject: Re: Simple Experiments (reply) To: Dr Roger Scott Cathey Content-Disposition: inline forwarded ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- From: INTERNET:Tebearden@aol.com, INTERNET:Tebearden@aol.com TO: (unknown), [75224,574] CC: (unknown), INTERNET:electra@texas.net (unknown), INTERNET:emre@texas.net (unknown), INTERNET:mps@internetmci.com Dr Fred Wood, INTERNET:fwood@igc.apc.org (unknown), INTERNET:csiri@igc.apc.org (unknown), INTERNET:bryrit@iamerica.net (unknown), INTERNET:Mhermanns@aol.com (unknown), INTERNET:shelburne_john@ccmail.ncsc.navy.mil (unknown), INTERNET:jparrott@ro.com (unknown), INTERNET:randyd@ro.com (unknown), INTERNET:jlkenny@bechtel.com (unknown), INTERNET:4kenmoore@sprintmail.com (unknown), FishnChips DATE: 04/09/97 00:30 RE: Re: Simple Experiments (reply) Dear Alan, Nobody is small! Everyone is a human being, and equal in that respect. What the heck, I started out to be a country-western guitar picker and singer (Louisiana Hayride, record contract, three records, played with folks like Johnny Horton, Jim Reeves, Red Sovine, etc. Wrote songs; one recorded by Reeves, one by Horton, one by Webb Pierce, etc. Then a little thing like the draft and military service interrupted the scenario.) ' In modern GR, it is energy that is gravitational, not mass per se. So for gravity we must track the energy; in fact, the COLLECTED energy, which is something a little different from just "energy." Change subjects. Let's work with particle and wave duality. Move an electron at a velocity. Well, today we know that space is a violent virtual flux. So that mass "cuts" that flux more rapidly. Some of the flux rotates 90 degrees, changing to 3-space. Then it rotates back out. That "right angle turn" is what we call "velocity c" as shown by the Lorentz transform. The extra rate at which it is cutting the flux is what is called "increase in mass." That's something that can be engineered if you get at it right, but that's another subject. Now as that electron picks up velocity (to you, the external observer), to you it seems to be "shortening" along its line of motion. (Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction). Well, that's because it is rotating (each little part of it is) out of your 3-space toward a 4th spatial dimension (not time, as they normally think). As it reaches speed c to you, it has now rotated (each little point has) by 90 degrees, and its length along the line of motion now seems zero to you. It's entire 3-space has rotated out of your three space a right angle turn, so it lost a dimension in its intersection with your space. So to you it looks like a flat plane, moving at the speed of light. Hey, that's (crudely speaking) a photon. Larger mass, it's a wavefront moving at c. That's what we call an "electromagnetic wave." Now get in front of that thing with a stationary mass and let the photon hit it. Bingo! It suddenly is flipped back that 90 degrees from its higher dimensional rotation, and re-enters your full 3-space and turns into a little increment of (3-space) mass, in that bigger absorbing mass. Roughly, the virtual photons in the vacuum are continually being absorbed and re-radiated back by every charged mass. That's a VIOLENT interaction that drives everything. In fact, it is happening for every mass. But it also has a broken symmetry; that part that "flips ninety degrees" (photon absorption) and then flips back 90 degrees again to be re-emitted as a photon, is what is involved in the asymmetry. The rate at which this "flip in, flip out" is occurring actually gives the mass of the object. After all, it's the rate at which action (angular momentum, which is what a photon is) is converting to mass and then back again. Mass is just a measure of the "rotation in and hesitation" before rotating back out again of the energy flux. It's the "condensation and hesitation" portion. That's crude, but will suffice here. Now EM theory left out half of the EM. The photons do NOT occur singly; they occur in pairs, normally, of a photon coupled with an antiphoton -- that's a graviton. When the incoming "photon" comes in to hit the mass, actually it's a graviton (photon-antiphoton pair) that hits it. The photon (time-forward!) interacts with the time-forward part of the atom, which is the electrons in the electron shells. The antiphoton (time-reversed) splits off and interacts with the (time-reversed) nucleus, producing the well-known Newtonian third law recoil. Electrodynamicists, having erroneously discarded the missing antiwave, just ignore it and accept that Newtonian recoil happens MYSTICALLY without any cause whatsoever. That violates quantum field theory, because in it every force is generated by exchange of virtual particles. So there had to be a virtual particle come in and hit the nucleus to produce the recoil force. That's the part that was erroneously excluded from EM by Faraday and Maxwell. Since the atom and every particle in it are continually bombarded from all sides by virtual particles from the vacuum, the atom and every particle in it are all PUMPED PHASE CONJUGATE MIRRORS. An atom is just such an assemblage. In phase conjugate optics (which in theory applies at any frequency, if the nonlinearity is sufficiently great), when a signal wave (ordinary wave) comes in and strikes a pumped (i.e., extra opposing waves rhythmically "squeezing" the mirror material) phase conjugate mirror, the mirror interacts with the incoming signal just before or as it is striking the atom. This is a purely multiwave interaction, because of the nonlinearity. The end result is that the antiphoton halves of the pump waves and the incoming signal wave are not allowed to reach the nucleus. Instead, they form an ensemble of antiphotons which is an antisignal (amplified phase conjugate replica) which is emitted back precisely along the direction through space previously taken by the incoming signal wave. (This is the simple case). Now here's an interesting fact. A pumped phase conjugate mirror material, no matter how powerfully pumped or how powerful a phase conjugate replica wave it emits, DOES NOT RECOIL. It does not exhibit Newtonian recoil of the nucleus BECAUSE THE ANTIPHOTONS DID NOT INTERACT IN THERE. (See Pepper's 40-odd page intro to phase conjugate optics, some years ago in OPTICAL ENGINEERING Journal). This is a HIGHLY SIMPLIFIED lay explanation; it's really a bit more complicated! But this will suffice for here, to get the point across as to what antigravity is. Anyway, the "excess absence" of positive energy is just the presence of excess "negative energy." Gravity is, as is well known, the presence of the negative (time-reversed, in this case) energy. Excess gravity affecting the nucleus would be the presence of excess negative (time-reversed) energy that interacts with the nucleus. Well, that means that ANTIGRAVITY for the nucleus is just the ABSENTING of a bunch of excess negative (time-reversed) energy that tries to reach the nucleus, but is intercepted first and redirected! Voila! Now we have the secret of antigravity being created in the nucleus. We cause an input of a lot of excess negative (time-reversed) incoming energy, and intercept it and redirect it away before it interacts with the nucleus. That will generate a unilateral thrust. So just orient that thrust upward, and you have antigravity. Look at it in terms of GR theory. You dramatically increase the negative energy density of the space immediately adjacent to the nucleus, then summarily expel that negative energy density away. That's it. That's all there is to it. You make a local curvature of spacetime (in the proper sense), then violently eject that local curvature and its negative energy density. That gives you "gravity traveling away" from you, which is identical to "antigravity traveling in" to you. Now this is rough, as I said, but about the simplest I can put it. From quantum field theory, we use the notion that all forces are created on their affected masses by exchange of virtual particles. That means that so is the Newtonian recoil force. In the PPCM, we ABSENT a Newtonian reaction force by ABSENTING some negative incoming unidirectional energy; i.e., by having some phase conjugate energy from that incoming signal wave that is deviated and not allowed to interact in the nucleus. Hey! Suppose you bring in a whale of a lot more of that incoming signal wave, with its (presently unrecognized) equal incoming antisignal wave. Suppose we now do the "pumped phase conjugate mirror bit" and intercept that extra incoming antisignal, and redirect it. Bingo! You will produce a unilateral extra force on the nucleus. And it will be a force IN THE DIRECTION of the missing Newtonian third law recoil force in the previous experiment. In other words, you just produced a unilateral thrust in the nuclei, toward the direction of your input signal. Increase the input signal, and you increase the output phase conjugate energy as well as your unilateral thrust. Now this happens all the time in phase conjugate optics. Just one problem. The magnitude of the effect is an inverse function of the frequency! At optical frequency, you will be hardput to measure the effect with even a very sensitive instrument. At ELF frequencies, you will produce thrust like gangbusters. As an estimate, for a 10% efficient process, 150 watts of this "excess effect" will levitate one pound against earth's gravity at the surface of the earth. The problem is, how do you build an ELF phase conjugate mirror? Well, with normal gradients of potentials etc., you cannot. But in the INTERIOR EM domain, inside the scalar potential, everything acts so nonlinearly that nonlinear optics functioning universally applies. So the secret is to pump at ELF (say, 60 Hertz as Sweet did) in the inner domain. Better yet, have the material self-oscillating with the vacuum flux (as Sweet did in his specially activated, self-oscillating magnets). I persuaded Sweet to rig the device as above, and got him to do the experiment with an early 6-lb device. It worked beautifully. The input was the gravitational force (which is a flux or waves, as you choose to regard it). The "excess input" resulted when Sweet connected additional load. So he just screwed in extra 100 watt bulbs, one at a time, and the device got lighter and lighter on the scales. Very smoothly. We had to stop at 1,000 watts, because magnetic monopoles deposited in the magnet during such process (at each point in there, you are curving local spacetime and steadily increaseing that curvature. The magnets will simply explode if you go too far, and Sweet did explode several magnets). I wrote a paper on the subject, placed Sweet's name first (since he invented the device), and by a fluke got it published in an IECEC proceedings. It just slipped through the cracks before they realized what was in it. Anyhow, that's the simple explanation of antigravity and how it works. And it does work, at least if you have a self-oscillating magnetic pumped phase conjugate mirror device with 60 Hz pumping in the inner EM domain, as Sweet had. Cheers, Tom Bearden